NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Thanks for your response, Bill! Bill Hibbard wrote:
Hi Kevin, First, I hope you got the recent answers to your questions on the list. The NOAA mail server was apparently down and I know of one NOAA person who failed to get some email.
I believe I received the answers to my questions, thanks!
My problem is that I don't know how to construct the data set so that VisAD can read/plot the az/ran data. I am unsure whether to try to create the domain [either (Range, Azimuth) or (Azimuth, Range)] as a Gridded2DSet, Irregular2DSet, or what. I have tried both. The Gridded2DSet fails saying that I do not have a valid grid (apparently when azimuth goes from 359 -> 0 degrees). The Irregular2DSet takes way to long and runs out of heap space (even when I set it to 512 Mb). So I guess my main question is how do I construct my domain set to be a valid grid composed of radar-centric polar coordinates - if it is even possible?What you want here is a Gridded2DSet. It could be radius = 0 that is causing the samples along one edge of your grid to be co-located (i.e., located at the same location). So you may need to nudge these samples to some radius > 0. Or you may need to nudge samples along other edges of your grid, to make sure that there are no co-located samples and no twsited grid boxes. If worse comes to worse, put print statements in the consistency check in the Gridded2DSet constructor to tell you the sample locations of the corners of the offending grid box.
Hmmm. The error I am getting does not appear to be related to a zero radius. Here is the output of the consistency check:
Samples[0][1] = 564688.6 Samples[0][0] = 565236.0 Samples[1][LengthX+1] = 314.9523 Samples[1][1] = 315.0188 Samples[1][1] = 315.0188 Samples[1][0] = 314.96332 Samples[0][LengthX+1] = 564034.06 Samples[0][1] = 564688.6 v00[]=Samples[][516] v10[]=Samples[][517] v01[]=Samples[][1549] v11[]=Samples[][1550]
Pos = true 1st = -333234.62 2nd = -333234.38 3rd = -333223.12 4th = -333223.38Exception in thread "main" visad.SetException: Gridded2DSet: samples do not form a valid grid (516,0)
It seems to occur at beginning of the second pass of lat/lon values of the original terrain data set domain I.e.,:
LengthX: 1033, LengthY: 863 Line: 0: 36.883, -115.975 --> 565236.0, 314.96332 Line: 1: 36.883, -115.96667 --> 564688.6, 315.0188 Line: 2: 36.883, -115.95833 --> 564141.3, 315.07446 ... Line: 1031: 36.883, -107.38333 --> 564032.2, 44.914436 Line: 1032: 36.883, -107.375 --> 564578.94, 44.97006 Line: 1033: 36.87467, -115.975 --> 564582.06, 314.89682 Line: 1034: 36.87467, -115.96667 --> 564034.06, 314.9523 I'm using the X & Y lengths from the original lat/lon domain.
Assuming that I'll process one netCDF file at a time (with a single corresponding radar location), I would then define my RealTypes "range" and "azimuth" and map them to XAxis and YAxis?Also, I assume that I would set my ScalarMaps to Display.Radius (Range) and Display.Longitude (Azimuth), but do I set my RealTypes (Range and Azimuth) to RealType.Radius and RealType.Longitude also?Actually, you may want to define the grid for each radar on a different RealTuple (range_i, azimuth_i), each with a different Radar2DCoordinateSystem to the (Latitude, Longitude) reference RealTuple. Then just use the ScalarMaps of Latitude and Longitude to XAxis and YAxis.
Thanks!!! -kevin. -- +------------------------------------------------------------+ Kevin L. Manross [KD5MYD] <>< (405)-366-0557 CIMMS Research Associate kevin.manross@xxxxxxxx [NSSL-WRDD/SWATN] http://www.cimms.ou.edu/~kmanross "My opinions are my own and not representative of CIMMS, NSSL, NOAA or any affiliates" +------------------------------------------------------------+
visad
archives: