NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.

Re: [wcsplus] asynchronous response

NOTE: The wcsplus mailing list is no longer active. The list archives are made available for historical reasons.

On Friday 05 October 2007 21:15, Ethan Davis wrote:
For Server capabilities, I came up with 3 or 4 capability types and how
to encode those in terms of both store/allowAsync parameters and just
the store parameter:

1) The server has full store/delay functionality

    a) store= {true|false}; allowAsync={true|false}

        [NOTE having dropped PUSH, does "store=F, allowAsync=T" make
        sense? And how do we handle that?]

    b) store={true|false|serverdecide}

        Dominic felt "false" and "serverdecide" didn't make sense
        together (or was it just those two with out "true"). I think
        this combination actually captures the "allowAsync" parameter
        very well. "false" doesn't allow async, "serverdecide" does
        allow async.


Yes, just to clarify I meant false and serverdecide together didn't make sense. i.e as a server you can't say "I don't support storage" and then say "I'm going to decide whether to or not to store the data".
Still reading the rest of your email... :)

Dominic


  • 2007 messages navigation, sorted by:
    1. Thread
    2. Subject
    3. Author
    4. Date
    5. ↑ Table Of Contents
  • Search the wcsplus archives: