NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
Anh Dao, In order for your plots in NMAP2 and SFMAP to be identicat, the FILTER should be the same, but your GAREA & PROJ and DEVICE (sizex;sizey) should be the same. The GAREA will affect station overlap. The DEVICE size (the text and symbol sizes used will cause differing amounts of overlap if the output DEVICE has a different size). If you are using the default display size of the XW of GF device (which is ~70% of your screen size), that may be the largest difference when compared to the NMAP2 canvas area. The Canvan in Nmap2 is defined in $NAWIPS/resource/Nmap as: Nmap*mainw_canvas.width: 1150 Nmap*mainw_canvas.height: 831 If you still have questions, please provide me with your output as well as full SFMAP settings. Steve Chiswell Unidata User Support > Institution: National Centre for Hydro-Meteorological Forecasting > Package Version: GEMPAK 5.7.4 > Operating System: Linux Red hat 9.0 > Hardware Information: 80GB > Inquiry: Hello all, > > In our operational working, we must make some analysis maps for surface and > upperair data. > > At first, we draw the isoline with surface and upperair data on the NMAP2 > interface. In the $GEMTBL/config/prmlst.tbl file, we set (for surface data): > > SFPARM = SKYK:.7:1:132;TMPC;SPAC;SMSL;SPAC;DWPC;SPAC;SPAC;SPAC;SPAC;SPAC > FILTER = 0.9 > TEXT = 0.857/21/HW > (The total of parameters is 11) > > Then we have a script on GEMPAK using SFMAP, SNMAP ... to make a final maps. > In these script we set: > > SFPARM = > SKYK:.7:1:132;TMPC;WSYM:.7:1;SMSL;PTND;DWPC;VSBK;CSYH:.7:1;CTYL;CSYM;CSYL:.7:1 > FILTER = 0.89 > TEXT = 0.857/21/HW > > Because when we open the surface data from NMAP2 to draw on it, the FILTER on > EDIT SOURCE tool is automatically change to 0.89. I don't know why ??? But is > the reason that I choose FILTER = 0.89 on my SFMAP script. > > The goal of this working is that I want the data that displays on NMAP2 and > the data on maps that I execute SFMAP script are totally identical. > > But I don't know why though the parameter in these two case are the same but > the data that display on NMAP2 and on the maps (that are made by SFMAP > script) are quite different. > > Please show me the solution to my troubles. > > I hope that you will help me as soon as possible. I write to you this > afternoon (local time) and do hope that I will receive your answer tomorrow > morning.Thank you in advance. > > With my best regards, > > Anh Dao Nguyen > > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: DFK-592579 Department: Support GEMPAK Priority: Normal Status: Closed