NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
> Hi Jeff > > Further to my former email. I now checked with considerably larger image > volume than I did before. With Xmx1200m I got again missing frames. I > then lowered to Xmx1024m and everything is fine again. Then I tried with > a really large volume that before had finally almost al frame deleted. > This time just half a frame is missing. > > I think I will keep Xmx1024m for the time being. It appears "optimum" > for my applications. Nevertheless, it is my feeling that we have some > strange behaviour here. NTW: I never mentioned it, there are no error > messages going with missing frames. > > HP, This is very odd behavior. Can you send a bundle that this problem shows up with? -Jeff Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: YND-789009 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open