NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[UDUNITS #XSU-810966]: udunits license is considered to be non-free



Justin,

The UDUNITS package is intended to be FOSS. Both GitHub and a license-person at 
the Free Software Foundation agree that it is.

The anti-software-patent clause in the UDUNITS license is similar in intent to 
the following (from which it was adopted and adapted):

    Section 7 of "Common Public License Version 1.0"
    Section 7 of "Common Public License, version 1.0 (CPL-1.0)"
    Section 7 of "IBM Public License Version 1.0 (IPL-1.0)"
    Section 8 of "Lucent Public License Version 1.02 (LPL-1.02)"
    Section 7 of "Lucent Public License, Plan 9, version 1.0 (LPL-1.0)"
    Clause 3 of "Apache License, Version 2.0"
    Clause 3 of "Educational Community License, Version 2.0 (ECL-2.0)"
    Clause 11(c) of "RealNetworks Public Source License Version 1.0 (RPSL-1.0)"
    Clause 10 of "The Non-Profit Open Software License version 3.0 (NPOSL-3.0)"
    Clause 10 of "The Open Software License 2.1 (OSL-2.1)"
    Clause 10 of "The Open Software License 3.0 (OSL-3.0)"
    Clause 10 of "Academic Free License 3.0"
    Clause 13 of "Artistic License 2.0"
    Section 7 of "Eclipse Public License -v 1.0"
    Section 7 of "Eclipse Public License 1.0 (EPL-1.0)"
    Clause 8 of "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License 1.1 
(CATOSL-1.1)"
    Section 10 of "GNU AFFERO GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE, Version 3 (AGPL-3.0)"
    Section 10 of "GNU General Public License, version 3 (GPL-3.0)"
    Clause 6(E) of "Adaptive Public License 1.0"

All the above can be found at the Open Source Initiative 
<https://opensource.org/search/node/cross-claim>.

The bug-report you referenced appears to indicate that we were asked about this 
before and refused to answer. I don't recall being asked about this (I'm the 
only developer and support person for the UDUNITS package).

Please feel free to continue this interesting conversation.

> Dear devs,
> 
> Gentoo Linux [1] has classified your extension of the BSD license used
> for udinits-2.2.20 to be non free. Is this your intention? Various
> extra questions have been raised by the licenses team. Could you
> please comment on that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 
> 1)
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=570076

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: XSU-810966
Department: Support UDUNITS
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed