Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7

• To: gembud <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
• From: "Smith, Neil R" <n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:49:26 +0000

Is no one plotting the navgem?

Anyone remember what the incompatible navigation issue is about?


On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Smith, Neil R 
<n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

What’s the key to ingesting navgem?

I’m using

FNMOC   (^US058.{4}-GR1mdl\.0018_0056_.{5}.{4})(.{4})(.{6})(.*)
        PIPE    /unidata/ldm/decoders/dcgrib2 -d 
data/gempak/logs/dcgrib2_navgem.log
        -e GEMTBL=/unidata/gempak/NAWIPS/gempak/tables

but getting screwy plotting results, and ingest log file entries like

160229/1637[DCGRIB 1] Grid navigation 56 incompatible with file 
data/gempak/model/fnmoc/navgem/2016022918f045_navgem.gem

This is GEMPAK7 and ldm 6.12.5

-Neil
_______________________________________________
gembud mailing list
gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit: 
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
    • From: Devin Eyre
  • Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
    • From: James Murakami

• References:
  • [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
    • From: Smith, Neil R