Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7

• To: "Smith, Neil R" <n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gembud <gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
• From: Devin Eyre <Devin.Eyre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:03:42 +0000

It sounds like there are different grids included in this that have different 
spacing.  If you give it a name for the gempak files that include the grid, 
such as data/gempak/model/navgem/YYYYMMDDHH_@@@.gem, the @@@ will be replaced 
by the grid number, and you should get all of them decoded.

________________________________
From: gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gembud-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on 
behalf of Smith, Neil R <n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 9:49 AM
To: gembud
Subject: Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7

Is no one plotting the navgem?

Anyone remember what the incompatible navigation issue is about?


On Feb 29, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Smith, Neil R 
<n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:n-smith2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

What's the key to ingesting navgem?

I'm using

FNMOC   (^US058.{4}-GR1mdl\.0018_0056_.{5}.{4})(.{4})(.{6})(.*)
        PIPE    /unidata/ldm/decoders/dcgrib2 -d 
data/gempak/logs/dcgrib2_navgem.log
        -e GEMTBL=/unidata/gempak/NAWIPS/gempak/tables

but getting screwy plotting results, and ingest log file entries like

160229/1637[DCGRIB 1] Grid navigation 56 incompatible with file 
data/gempak/model/fnmoc/navgem/2016022918f045_navgem.gem

This is GEMPAK7 and ldm 6.12.5

-Neil
_______________________________________________
gembud mailing list
gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit: 
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/

• References:
  • [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
    • From: Smith, Neil R
  • Re: [gembud] navgem in GEMPAK7
    • From: Smith, Neil R