Re: [ldm-users] Beams missing from top level scan in level 2 NEXRAD data

• To: Gilbert Sebenste <gilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Beams missing from top level scan in level 2 NEXRAD data
• From: Greg Stossmeister <gstoss@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:02:29 -0600

Gilbert,
     We are still using LDM 6.11.2 - a ways behind I know. I'm not sure
what you mean by coding software - how we are looking at the data? We are
using an NCAR package called CIDD for visualizing the data. I think the
problem may be I'm not saving these files in a two-step process as
described here: https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/data/radar.html I'm only using
the first pattern.

Thanks,
    Greg

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Gilbert Sebenste <gilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> I haven't noticed it. What version of LDM and the coding software are you
> using? Just curious.
>
> Gilbert
>
>
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stossmeister <gstoss@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We've recently discovered that we are missing roughly a third of the beams
> from the highest elevation scan in the level 2 data we are receiving. We've
> seen this with every NEXRAD we've randomly checked. This also seems to have
> been going on for quite some time - > months. We are trying to figure out
> the cause. Has anyone else noticed this in the level 2 data?
>
> Thanks,
>     Greg
>
> Greg Stossmeister
> Interim Facility Manager
> Data Management & Services Facility
> NCAR/Earth Observing Laboratory
> 303.497.8692 <(303)%20497-8692>
> gstoss@xxxxxxxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE: All exchanges posted to Unidata maintained email lists are
> recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and made publicly
> available through the web.  Users who post to any of the lists we
> maintain are reminded to remove any personal information that they
> do not want to be made public.
>
>
> ldm-users mailing list
> ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe,  visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
>
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ldm-users] Beams missing from top level scan in level 2 NEXRAD data
    • From: Gilbert Sebenste

• References:
  • [ldm-users] Beams missing from top level scan in level 2 NEXRAD data
    • From: Greg Stossmeister
  • Re: [ldm-users] Beams missing from top level scan in level 2 NEXRAD data
    • From: Gilbert Sebenste