NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
2014-11-06 20:16 GMT+00:00 Gus Correa <gus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Can one build the Fortran bindings without building beforehand the > C bindings? > I don't think so. > You are correct. > At least not up to NetCDF 4.3.0 (C), 4.2 (Fortran) > , cxx4-4.2.1 (C++), the last ones I built. > > As far as I know, everything linked to the Fortran bindings (-lnetcdff) > requires linking to the C library as well (-lnetcdf). > Likewise for C++. > > Isn't this the chain of wrappers? > F90 -> Fortran -> C > That is how my interpretation is as I wrote in my response. However, for the F03 binding, the wrapper is direct, F03 -> C. > C++ -> C > > Thank you, > Gus Correa > > On 11/06/2014 02:49 PM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote: > >> Well, F03, is still a wrapper, but not in the same way as the older >> versions :) >> >> 2014-11-06 19:48 GMT+00:00 Nick Papior Andersen <nickpapior@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:nickpapior@xxxxxxxxx>>: >> >> My basic understanding is this: >> 1. The "old" version of the fortran library (<=4.2) was just a wrapper >> 1a. The F90 interface was a wrapper for the fortran library. >> 2. Later versions can utilize the fortran 03 library which is a (to >> my understanding) complete interface to the c library using F03 >> standard interface operability, so here it is not a wrapper. >> 2a. If not compiled against the F03 std it is very similar (if not >> totally?) to the older versions. >> >> 2014-11-06 19:30 GMT+00:00 Chris Barker <chris.barker@xxxxxxxx >> <mailto:chris.barker@xxxxxxxx>>: >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Nick Papior Andersen >> <nickpapior@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:nickpapior@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> Sure, it was more a pedantic outburst... :) >> I just think supplying both is crucial. :) >> >> >> Sure -- and I haven't looked at th code -- is the Fortran lib >> just a wrapper around the C lib anyway? >> >> -Chris >> >> -- >> >> Christopher Barker, Ph.D. >> Oceanographer >> >> Emergency Response Division >> NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 <tel:%28206%29%20526-6959> voice >> 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 >> <tel:%28206%29%20526-6329> fax >> Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 <tel:%28206%29%20526-6317> >> main reception >> >> Chris.Barker@xxxxxxxx <mailto:Chris.Barker@xxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Kind regards Nick >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Kind regards Nick >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netcdfgroup mailing list >> netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > netcdfgroup mailing list > netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For list information or to unsubscribe, visit: > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/ > -- Kind regards Nick
netcdfgroup archives: