NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.

To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IDV #GCI-726330]: Thanks man....



Hi Jim-

> Full Name: Jim Steenburgh
> Email Address: address@hidden
> Organization: University of Utah
> Package Version: 2.9a1 build date:2010-04-30 20:54 UTC
> Operating System: Mac OS X
> Hardware: Java: home: 
> /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Home version: 
> 1.6.0_15 j3d:1.5.2 fcs (build4)
> Description of problem: Don:
> 
> Sending along this bundle.  Thanks for all the help this week.  This gets me 
> closer than I have been in a long time at integrating the RUC into the 
> satellite imagery and observations.  To have something that allows me to 
> toggle through imagery and be overlaying lots of analysis fields and 
> mesoscale resolution is really great.
> 
> Further, thanks to the aperture filter, I'm able to smooth out some of the 
> diagnostic fields (e.g., absolute vorticity), which makes large-scale 
> interpretation a bit easier.  I have done that in this bundle for a few 
> fields.  It works WAY better than SM9S because you can specify a grid 
> increment that makes sense physically.

Glad this helps.

> I'm hoping to incorporate radar imagery and surface data next.  That's where 
> being able to specify a time increment for relative time, or having some sort 
> of time matching to the satellite will help (e.g., the radar is 5 min, sat 
> 15, surface obs vary).

It's on the TODO list. ;-)

> While I have your ear, one thing that would be good is to specify in the 
> display info on the bottom whether or not the RUC is an analysis or forecast 
> hour (and what forecast hour it is).  Right now, it only specifies the date 
> and time.  Doing this for all grids might be helpful.  You could include the 
> model name and forecast hour (e.g., RUC2 F000 for the analysis) right at the 
> beginning of the line.

Right now, on the IDV side, we lose that information.  We only have one time 
and that is the valid time. I agree it would be a good addition, but don't have 
a good, quick solution.  I'll add it to the TODO list.
 
Don

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: GCI-726330
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Open