NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
NOTICE: This version of the NSF Unidata web site (archive.unidata.ucar.edu) is no longer being updated.
Current content can be found at unidata.ucar.edu.
To learn about what's going on, see About the Archive Site.
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:33 -0500, Gerry Creager wrote: > Peter, > > Experience has shown that SELinux and LDM were not, in the past, > friends. I'd also argue that, unless you're with NSA, it's likely not > needed for most LDM machines. Enforcing SELinux has caused me all sorts > of issues in the past, with few identifiable benefits. I'll second that. SELinux is OK for a desktop system (email, web, word processing) or a file server but it is unusable for most other applications. At least now, there is a way to configure it to allow certain things but getting that to work can be painful. I find if you're not making the computer publicly accessible (i.e. remote login from the world), you don't need that level of security. So why go through the pain to try and enable SELinux. ________________________________________________________________________ Daniel Vietor Mail: devo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Unisys Corp Title: Engineer/Meteorologist 2476 Swedesford Rd Phone: 610-648-3623 Malvern PA 19355 Fax: 610-695-5524
ldm-users archives: